[atomic-testing] Apache httpd 2.2.16-3

Atomic repository announcements, new release notifications and other news regarding the atomic yum repository.
scott
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Posts: 8355
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
Location: earth
Contact:

Re: [atomic-testing] Apache httpd 2.2.16-3

Unread post by scott »

I think its talking about httpd.worker not httpd.itk.
Highland
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 674
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:55 pm

Re: [atomic-testing] Apache httpd 2.2.16-3

Unread post by Highland »

Any ideas why it kills PHP then?
"Its not a mac. I run linux... I'm actually cool." - scott
scott
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Posts: 8355
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
Location: earth
Contact:

Re: [atomic-testing] Apache httpd 2.2.16-3

Unread post by scott »

Nope, thats your job :P
Highland
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 674
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:55 pm

Re: [atomic-testing] Apache httpd 2.2.16-3

Unread post by Highland »

Took a bit to track it down. /etc/httpd/conf.d/php.conf by default looks for prefork and ONLY prefork. Change
<IfModule prefork.c>
to
<IfModule !worker.c>
and it will work with itk
"Its not a mac. I run linux... I'm actually cool." - scott
premierhosting
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 257
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: [atomic-testing] Apache httpd 2.2.16-3

Unread post by premierhosting »

How's this project coming along? Looks interesting, I'm waiting to hear that it's stable on Centos5.5.
Highland
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 674
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:55 pm

Re: [atomic-testing] Apache httpd 2.2.16-3

Unread post by Highland »

It's relatively stable for me on my test server thus far (with mpm-itk enabled). It's not bad but there's only one production server I'd use it on since the other is mostly one giant app.
"Its not a mac. I run linux... I'm actually cool." - scott
scott
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Posts: 8355
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
Location: earth
Contact:

Re: [atomic-testing] Apache httpd 2.2.16-3

Unread post by scott »

mod_ruid2 has kind of derailed this for the moment. It seems like a less disruptive approach than a full httpd upgrade. Right now the pros are:

* httpd 2.2.17 looks more impressive than 2.2.3 because the number is higher. (Please give me a real pro here :P)

and the cons:
* It will break the service out of the box due to the deprecated memcache and other modules.
Highland
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 674
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:55 pm

Re: [atomic-testing] Apache httpd 2.2.16-3

Unread post by Highland »

Depends on if you rely on yum vs pecl for your module. v.17 handles my pecl compiled module just fine. In fact, I tend to advise people to avoid using yum pecl libraries and just install them yourself (pecl makes it just as easy as yum in most cases).

But yeah, I can't think of any real benefits I'm seeing of .17 over .3. Best to let sleeping dogs lie.
"Its not a mac. I run linux... I'm actually cool." - scott
Post Reply