[atomic-testing] Apache httpd 2.2.16-3
-
- Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
- Posts: 8355
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
- Location: earth
- Contact:
Re: [atomic-testing] Apache httpd 2.2.16-3
I think its talking about httpd.worker not httpd.itk.
Re: [atomic-testing] Apache httpd 2.2.16-3
Any ideas why it kills PHP then?
"Its not a mac. I run linux... I'm actually cool." - scott
-
- Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
- Posts: 8355
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
- Location: earth
- Contact:
Re: [atomic-testing] Apache httpd 2.2.16-3
Nope, thats your job
Re: [atomic-testing] Apache httpd 2.2.16-3
Took a bit to track it down. /etc/httpd/conf.d/php.conf by default looks for prefork and ONLY prefork. Change
to<IfModule prefork.c>
and it will work with itk<IfModule !worker.c>
"Its not a mac. I run linux... I'm actually cool." - scott
-
- Forum Regular
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:52 pm
Re: [atomic-testing] Apache httpd 2.2.16-3
How's this project coming along? Looks interesting, I'm waiting to hear that it's stable on Centos5.5.
Re: [atomic-testing] Apache httpd 2.2.16-3
It's relatively stable for me on my test server thus far (with mpm-itk enabled). It's not bad but there's only one production server I'd use it on since the other is mostly one giant app.
"Its not a mac. I run linux... I'm actually cool." - scott
-
- Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
- Posts: 8355
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
- Location: earth
- Contact:
Re: [atomic-testing] Apache httpd 2.2.16-3
mod_ruid2 has kind of derailed this for the moment. It seems like a less disruptive approach than a full httpd upgrade. Right now the pros are:
* httpd 2.2.17 looks more impressive than 2.2.3 because the number is higher. (Please give me a real pro here )
and the cons:
* It will break the service out of the box due to the deprecated memcache and other modules.
* httpd 2.2.17 looks more impressive than 2.2.3 because the number is higher. (Please give me a real pro here )
and the cons:
* It will break the service out of the box due to the deprecated memcache and other modules.
Re: [atomic-testing] Apache httpd 2.2.16-3
Depends on if you rely on yum vs pecl for your module. v.17 handles my pecl compiled module just fine. In fact, I tend to advise people to avoid using yum pecl libraries and just install them yourself (pecl makes it just as easy as yum in most cases).
But yeah, I can't think of any real benefits I'm seeing of .17 over .3. Best to let sleeping dogs lie.
But yeah, I can't think of any real benefits I'm seeing of .17 over .3. Best to let sleeping dogs lie.
"Its not a mac. I run linux... I'm actually cool." - scott