Search found 30 matches

by stephan-zrh
Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:12 am
Forum: Atomicorp Modsecurity Rules Support
Topic: Spam-Links in Joomla-Content, blocked by 337106?
Replies: 0
Views: 9483

Spam-Links in Joomla-Content, blocked by 337106?

Hello, This week we discovered some spam-links injected into content of old Joomla-Installations (2.5.28). In the apache-logs I found several requests with JDatabasedriverMysqli in them that started to get blocked around mid december 2015 by rule 337106. Before that the requests seem to have gotten ...
by stephan-zrh
Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:05 am
Forum: Atomicorp Modsecurity Rules Support
Topic: More referrer spam
Replies: 5
Views: 13990

Re: More referrer spam

Hello, Just wondering if there is any progress on this. Unfortunately, the problem is becoming increasingly annoying. We have a new customer's site up for a month and already the referrer-spammers are showing up (see attached image). I also found this list: http://perishablepress.com/blacklist/ultim...
by stephan-zrh
Tue Apr 14, 2015 3:28 am
Forum: Atomicorp Modsecurity Rules Support
Topic: More referrer spam
Replies: 5
Views: 13990

Re: More referrer spam

Just a short followup-question:

Is there a timeline for the GUI so that we can enter such URLs ourselves? It would of course be ideal, if we could just click a checkbox to notify you of such entries instead of having to notify you separately.

Kind regards

-Stephan
by stephan-zrh
Tue Apr 14, 2015 12:53 am
Forum: Atomicorp Modsecurity Rules Support
Topic: More referrer spam
Replies: 5
Views: 13990

Re: More referrer spam

Hello,

Just wanted to ask regarding these spammers. I see in the rules that best-seo-solution is listed but not yet the others (also not from the site linked above). Will you be adding these also?

Kind regards

-Stephan
by stephan-zrh
Thu Apr 09, 2015 12:41 am
Forum: Atomicorp Modsecurity Rules Support
Topic: More referrer spam
Replies: 5
Views: 13990

Re: More referrer spam

Thanks a lot!
by stephan-zrh
Tue Apr 07, 2015 1:18 am
Forum: Atomicorp Modsecurity Rules Support
Topic: More referrer spam
Replies: 5
Views: 13990

More referrer spam

Hello, We are getting complaints about more referrer spam: best-seo-solution.com *.simple-share-buttons.com *.social-buttons.com A customer sent a screenshot from Google Analytics, listing *.social-buttons.com, but I can't find it right away in the logs. I have attached the screenshot. Unfortunately...
by stephan-zrh
Thu Mar 26, 2015 3:01 am
Forum: Atomicorp Modsecurity Rules Support
Topic: [SOLVED] Referrer Spam buttons-for-website.com
Replies: 12
Views: 20089

Re: Referrer Spam buttons-for-website.com

Now it's working: 119.94.118.161 - - [26/Mar/2015:07:22:20 +0100] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 403 188 "http://buttons-for-website.com" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/36.0.1985.143 Safari/537.36" 37.77.122.42 - - [26/Mar/2015:08:4...
by stephan-zrh
Wed Mar 18, 2015 7:47 am
Forum: Atomicorp Modsecurity Rules Support
Topic: [SOLVED] Referrer Spam buttons-for-website.com
Replies: 12
Views: 20089

Re: Referrer Spam buttons-for-website.com

Thanks for your help! I just noticed these entries in access_log: 210.4.115.212 - - [18/Mar/2015:07:39:15 +0100] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 12576 "http://buttons-for-website.com" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/36.0.1985.143 Safar...
by stephan-zrh
Tue Mar 10, 2015 3:11 am
Forum: Atomicorp Modsecurity Rules Support
Topic: [SOLVED] Referrer Spam buttons-for-website.com
Replies: 12
Views: 20089

Re: Referrer Spam buttons-for-website.com

I just noticed that in the Rule it says buttons-for-websites.com. But the referrer is actually buttons-for-website.com (not websiteS).

I had it wrong in my original message.

Kind regards -Stephan
by stephan-zrh
Thu Mar 05, 2015 2:39 am
Forum: Atomicorp Modsecurity Rules Support
Topic: [SOLVED] Referrer Spam buttons-for-website.com
Replies: 12
Views: 20089

Re: Referrer Spam buttons-for-website.com

Thanks, here are some requests I found in access_log: 177.101.127.50 - - [28/Feb/2015:12:02:40 +0100] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 301 448 "http://buttons-for-website.com" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/36.0.1985.143 Safari/537.36"...
by stephan-zrh
Tue Mar 03, 2015 5:00 am
Forum: Atomicorp Modsecurity Rules Support
Topic: [SOLVED] Referrer Spam buttons-for-website.com
Replies: 12
Views: 20089

[SOLVED] Referrer Spam buttons-for-website.com

Hello, Google Analytics is increasingly reporting hits from buttons-for-websites.com. It seems to be similar to semalt.com (referrer spam), which gets blocked by ASL rule 393766. Can you add buttons-for-website.com so it gets blocked or can I do it myself? Kind regards -Stephan EDIT: corrected refer...
by stephan-zrh
Fri Feb 13, 2015 2:50 am
Forum: Atomic Protector (formerly ASL)
Topic: Networks get blocked / multi. drop / best practices?
Replies: 3
Views: 5192

Re: Networks get blocked / multi. drop / best practices?

Thank you very much for the elaborate answer! That gives me some food for thought.

Kind regards

-Stephan
by stephan-zrh
Tue Feb 10, 2015 6:35 am
Forum: Atomic Protector (formerly ASL)
Topic: Networks get blocked / multi. drop / best practices?
Replies: 3
Views: 5192

Networks get blocked / multi. drop / best practices?

Hello, We are having some corporate customers getting blocked because of multiple drop events from the same source. Some hosts within their networks connect to various ports that are not in use and we are asking customers to review their networks and possibly not connect to our servers on unused por...
by stephan-zrh
Fri Jan 30, 2015 2:37 am
Forum: Atomic Protector (formerly ASL)
Topic: [SOLVED] rkhunter repeated warnings
Replies: 4
Views: 8309

Re: rkhunter repeated warnings

scott wrote:Reinstall elinks and run rkhunter --propupd?
That worked. Thanks!