Yes, QA and DEV is allowed.
From the wiki: https://www.atomicorp.com/wiki/index.ph ... _server.3F
"Each ASL license allows you to run ASL on one production system, one QA system and one development system. "
Search found 492 matches
- Mon May 05, 2014 7:37 am
- Forum: Atomic Protector (formerly ASL)
- Topic: ASL QA/Dev question
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3470
- Fri Apr 04, 2014 5:00 am
- Forum: Anti-Spam Help and Discussion
- Topic: QMAIL - Emails are sent from the server IP, not domain IP
- Replies: 18
- Views: 121303
Re: QMAIL - Emails are sent from the server IP, not domain I
+1 for pamdyke+Haggy's SCP GUI
- Sat Mar 29, 2014 3:40 am
- Forum: Control Panel Support Help
- Topic: Send only mailbox in Plesk
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9707
Re: Send only mailbox in Plesk
ok, so you might get it to work by using a forward. Good idea!
- Fri Mar 28, 2014 9:00 am
- Forum: Control Panel Support Help
- Topic: Send only mailbox in Plesk
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9707
Re: Send only mailbox in Plesk
Scott: you mean you forge the address?
- Thu Mar 27, 2014 9:03 am
- Forum: Control Panel Support Help
- Topic: Send only mailbox in Plesk
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9707
Re: Send only mailbox in Plesk
Just thinking safety. I primarily use it for machines sending email (scanners, routers, services etc) and it's nice to have a way for them to send email. If a mailbox is connected to the mail account it will be filled eventually.
- Wed Mar 26, 2014 3:27 pm
- Forum: Control Panel Support Help
- Topic: Send only mailbox in Plesk
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9707
Send only mailbox in Plesk
Before Plesk 11 it was possible to have a mail account just for sending emails, you didn't have to enable the mailbox function. From Plesk 11 this is necessary or you cannot connect to the account. Anyone know a way around it?
- Mon Feb 17, 2014 3:55 pm
- Forum: Atomic Protector (formerly ASL)
- Topic: Per Port ACLs
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4631
Re: Per Port ACLs
The results from stopping iptables is expected. ASL doesn't allow unloading of kernel modules.
- Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:16 am
- Forum: Anti-Spam Help and Discussion
- Topic: New spamdyke 5.0
- Replies: 7
- Views: 15081
Re: New spamdyke 5.0
Looks like we are in the same situation then...
- Tue Feb 04, 2014 9:30 am
- Forum: Anti-Spam Help and Discussion
- Topic: New spamdyke 5.0
- Replies: 7
- Views: 15081
Re: New spamdyke 5.0
Have you implemented it? Any hurdles?
- Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:03 am
- Forum: Control Panel Support Help
- Topic: Plesk 12, mod_sec and fail2ban
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8466
Re: Plesk 12, mod_sec and fail2ban
Intriguing Mike, intriguing!
- Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:03 am
- Forum: Anti-Spam Help and Discussion
- Topic: New spamdyke 5.0
- Replies: 7
- Views: 15081
New spamdyke 5.0
A new spamdyke is released including some new features and some changed configuration. This will not be an no hands on update, if understand the changelog correctly.
http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/Changelog.txt
http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/U ... sion_5.txt
http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/Changelog.txt
http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/U ... sion_5.txt
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 8:17 am
- Forum: Atomic Protector (formerly ASL)
- Topic: psmon reports ossec-hids fails to restart (one solution)
- Replies: 13
- Views: 11336
- Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:54 pm
- Forum: Atomic Protector (formerly ASL)
- Topic: no access to Plesk on 8443 (solution)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5628
Re: no access to Plesk on 8443 (solution)
And I need one for you reply!
- Fri Jan 17, 2014 9:22 am
- Forum: Atomic Protector (formerly ASL)
- Topic: no access to Plesk on 8443 (solution)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5628
Re: no access to Plesk on 8443 (solution)
This strikes me as a good example of the way you should work when trying to fix connection problems. I could have been taken from thethe famous firewall book by the infamous Atomicorp brothers.
http://www.amazon.com/Troubleshooting-L ... 321227239/
http://www.amazon.com/Troubleshooting-L ... 321227239/
- Wed Jan 08, 2014 1:07 pm
- Forum: Atomic Protector (formerly ASL)
- Topic: Error message tortixd
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4822
Re: Error message tortixd
Hm, how do you mean? Should I add publicip my.correct.servername to /etc/hosts? Right now the server resolves my.correct.servername to 127.0.0.1 cat /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4 localhost4.localdomain4 my.correct.servername my ::1 localhost localhost.localdomain lo...