Search found 278 matches

by Imaging
Thu Oct 01, 2020 11:25 am
Forum: Requests
Topic: ClamAV 0.103.0
Replies: 1
Views: 11182

ClamAV 0.103.0

FYI, ClamAV 0.103.0 was released a few weeks ago:

https://blog.clamav.net/2020/09/clamav- ... eased.html

Could you please update both the ASL and Atomic repo packages to 0.103.0?

Thanks.
by Imaging
Tue Jul 21, 2020 9:37 am
Forum: Requests
Topic: ClamAV 0.102.4
Replies: 0
Views: 39411

ClamAV 0.102.4

FYI ClamAV 0.102.4 is out:

https://blog.clamav.net/2020/07/clamav- ... eased.html

with security patches. Could you please update both the ASL and Atomic repo packages to 0.102.4?

Thanks.
by Imaging
Tue May 26, 2020 11:53 am
Forum: Requests
Topic: ClamAV 0.102.3
Replies: 0
Views: 39760

ClamAV 0.102.3

FYI ClamAV 0.102.3 is out:

https://blog.clamav.net/2020/05/clamav- ... eased.html

with security patches. Could you please update both the ASL and Atomic repo packages to 0.102.3?

Thanks.
by Imaging
Wed Mar 04, 2020 10:22 am
Forum: Requests
Topic: ClamAV 0.102.2
Replies: 2
Views: 16239

Re: ClamAV 0.102.2

Thank you for the explanation. Is it possible to have a new rpm, say atomic-clamav-libcurl for example that would have the newer version of libcurl and then use that rpm with the newer clamav as a way to get around the older OS version in 7?
by Imaging
Fri Feb 21, 2020 10:50 am
Forum: Requests
Topic: ClamAV 0.102.2
Replies: 2
Views: 16239

ClamAV 0.102.2

FYI, it appears that the ClamAV 0.101.x branch is EOL per: "The TL;DR is: We're no longer publishing new ClamAV 0.100 or 0.101 patch versions. I advise everyone to upgrade to 0.102.2" from https://lists.clamav.net/pipermail/clamav-devel/2020-February/000528.html Could you please update bot...
by Imaging
Wed Feb 12, 2020 8:09 am
Forum: Requests
Topic: ClamAV 0.101.5
Replies: 4
Views: 14599

Re: ClamAV 0.101.5

Could someone please post an update on the Atomic repo packages? We have the packages on our ASL boxes already but not seeing anything as of yet for the few boxes that use the Atomic repo. Thanks.
by Imaging
Tue Jan 28, 2020 1:00 pm
Forum: Requests
Topic: ClamAV 0.101.5
Replies: 4
Views: 14599

Re: ClamAV 0.101.5

Updates on the Atomic repo packages? Thanks.
by Imaging
Tue Jan 07, 2020 12:30 pm
Forum: Requests
Topic: ClamAV 0.101.5
Replies: 4
Views: 14599

Re: ClamAV 0.101.5

Any update on the Atomic repo packages? Thank you.
by Imaging
Wed Dec 18, 2019 12:29 pm
Forum: Requests
Topic: ClamAV 0.101.5
Replies: 4
Views: 14599

Re: ClamAV 0.101.5

Thanks for posting the ASL repo packages some days ago. Could you please also post the updated Atomic repo packages? Thanks.
by Imaging
Tue Nov 26, 2019 11:02 am
Forum: Requests
Topic: ClamAV 0.101.5
Replies: 4
Views: 14599

ClamAV 0.101.5

FYI, ClamAV 0.101.5 is out:

https://blog.clamav.net/2019/11/clamav- ... -have.html

with a security fix.

Could you please update both the ASL and Atomic repo packages?

Thanks.
by Imaging
Wed Aug 28, 2019 4:00 pm
Forum: Requests
Topic: ClamAV 0.101.4
Replies: 2
Views: 12840

Re: ClamAV 0.101.4

Thanks!
by Imaging
Tue Aug 27, 2019 12:25 pm
Forum: Atomicorp Modsecurity Rules Support
Topic: Yum upadte epel vs asl4
Replies: 1
Views: 15819

Re: Yum upadte epel vs asl4

We add an exclude statement under [epel] in our epel.repo file. For example:

exclude=clamav* clamd

to keep the versions/repos from conflicting so that the asl versions will be the primary versions.
by Imaging
Thu Aug 22, 2019 10:12 am
Forum: Requests
Topic: ClamAV 0.101.4
Replies: 2
Views: 12840

ClamAV 0.101.4

FYI, ClamAV 0.101.4 is out:

https://blog.clamav.net/2019/08/clamav- ... e-has.html

with security fixes.

Could you please update both the ASL and Atomic repo packages?

Thanks.
by Imaging
Wed Aug 07, 2019 2:23 pm
Forum: Requests
Topic: ClamAV 0.101.3
Replies: 0
Views: 45902

ClamAV 0.101.3

FYI, ClamAV 0.101.3 is out:

https://blog.clamav.net/2019/08/clamav- ... e-and.html

with security fixes.

Could you please update both the ASL and Atomic repo packages?

Thanks.
by Imaging
Tue Jul 09, 2019 2:32 pm
Forum: Atomic Protector (formerly ASL)
Topic: SACK
Replies: 7
Views: 19722

Re: SACK

Thank you. What would be the best way to test that all is protecting as it should?