[atomic] PHP 5.2.13

Atomic repository announcements, new release notifications and other news regarding the atomic yum repository.
BruceLee
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 879
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:58 pm
Location: Germany

Re: [atomic] PHP 5.2.13

Unread post by BruceLee »

sorry and thanks for the hints. I'm a mangler :)
Next time I will use your code to create a patch and hopefully find some more time to get to know things like that better.

As I can see you put another update online.
php-eaccelerator-5.2.13_0.9.6-3.el5.art.x86_64.rpm
You compiled it with the patch, right?
Installed it and segfaults no longer show up.

One Googolplex times "Thanks you"
diego
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 5:01 pm

Re: [atomic] PHP 5.2.13

Unread post by diego »

I installed the last revision of php-eaccelerator from art's repo and this version sends more Segmentation Faults the the old one, even droped all my wordpress blogs.
diego
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 5:01 pm

Re: [atomic] PHP 5.2.13

Unread post by diego »

Here's what happens when i installed the last version of php-eaccelerator, as soon as i remove it no more segmentation faults.
Image
johnthomas001
Forum User
Forum User
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:53 pm

Re: [atomic] PHP 5.2.13

Unread post by johnthomas001 »

I too have the segmentation faults with the latest eaccelerator update.
Bierteufel
Forum User
Forum User
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 8:03 am

Re: [atomic] PHP 5.2.13

Unread post by Bierteufel »

I am also. ;-(
BruceLee
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 879
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:58 pm
Location: Germany

Re: [atomic] PHP 5.2.13

Unread post by BruceLee »

maybe you should provide some imformations, logs, circumstances, etc.
otherwise no one can help. i dont have any segfaults with this version anymore.
johnthomas001
Forum User
Forum User
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:53 pm

Re: [atomic] PHP 5.2.13

Unread post by johnthomas001 »

I am not sure logs would be helpful, but here goes:

tail -n500 /var/log/httpd/error_log
<snip>
[Fri Mar 12 11:23:47 2010] [notice] child pid 26828 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:23:47 2010] [notice] child pid 26831 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:23:47 2010] [notice] child pid 26835 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:23:47 2010] [notice] child pid 26842 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:23:47 2010] [notice] child pid 26843 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:23:47 2010] [notice] child pid 26848 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:23:47 2010] [notice] child pid 26849 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:23:47 2010] [notice] child pid 26856 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:23:47 2010] [notice] child pid 26859 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:23:47 2010] [notice] child pid 26866 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:23:48 2010] [notice] child pid 26834 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:23:48 2010] [notice] child pid 26845 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:23:48 2010] [notice] child pid 26846 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:23:48 2010] [notice] child pid 26858 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:23:48 2010] [notice] child pid 26871 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:23:52 2010] [notice] child pid 26830 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:23:52 2010] [notice] child pid 26855 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:23:54 2010] [notice] child pid 26877 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:24:01 2010] [notice] child pid 26874 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:24:05 2010] [notice] child pid 26850 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:24:06 2010] [notice] child pid 26876 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:24:10 2010] [notice] child pid 26847 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:24:19 2010] [notice] child pid 26829 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:24:19 2010] [notice] child pid 26867 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
<reverting to old eaccellerator.ini in case that is it>
[Fri Mar 12 11:24:51 2010] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down
[Fri Mar 12 11:24:52 2010] [notice] Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS) configured -- resuming normal operations
[Fri Mar 12 11:25:01 2010] [notice] child pid 26905 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:25:02 2010] [notice] child pid 26904 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:25:02 2010] [notice] child pid 26907 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:25:06 2010] [notice] child pid 26906 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:25:06 2010] [notice] child pid 26910 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
[Fri Mar 12 11:25:09 2010] [notice] child pid 26908 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
<reverting to old rpm>
[Fri Mar 12 11:26:20 2010] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down
[Fri Mar 12 11:26:22 2010] [notice] Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS) configured -- resuming normal operations
<ahhhh>
scott
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Posts: 8355
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
Location: earth
Contact:

Re: [atomic] PHP 5.2.13

Unread post by scott »

Since this seems to be about eaccelerator and not PHP 5.2.13, can you folks move the followups to the eaccelerator thread.
johnthomas001
Forum User
Forum User
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:53 pm

Re: [atomic] PHP 5.2.13

Unread post by johnthomas001 »

Scott,

First, thank you for the RPMs. They are great. I am getting these for free and understand I have no leverage.

With regards to your last comment, I am confused. It seems this thread had a request for an updated Eaccelerator RPM and as a result 1:5.2.13_0.9.6-3.el5.art was pushed out. Many people are having trouble with 1:5.2.13_0.9.6-3.el5.art, but 1:5.2.13_0.9.6-1.el5.art works fine (except for one commentor). Your last comment suggest the comments about 1:5.2.13_0.9.6-3.el5.art being broken be taking elsewhere (and to where I do not know). It could be I do not understand, that happened before, once (grin).

Please help me understand.
dayo
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 158
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 1:33 pm

[atomic-testing] PHP 5.2.13-2

Unread post by dayo »

To JohnThomas:
Did you miss Scott's post directly above yours asking that follow ups on these eaccelarator issues be put into the eaccelerator thread?

To Scott:
Any follow up on the php-fpm lines commented out of the spec file as per my post above? Tips and pointers most appreciated as I am lost as to where to look or how to actually get fpm running or whether I even need to do anything extra at all.

Main issue is that I was expecting a conf file which I can't find.

Thanks.
scott
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Posts: 8355
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
Location: earth
Contact:

Re: [atomic] PHP 5.2.13

Unread post by scott »

They are commented out because the new patch no longer creates those files. The old one did, which is why its referenced in the spec. I dont use fpm so I cant really give you any guidance here, my recommendation at this point would be to check out the site here on what your next steps should be http://php-fpm.org/ and let me know if something needs to be changed in the package.
dayo
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 158
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 1:33 pm

Re: [atomic] PHP 5.2.13

Unread post by dayo »

Hi Scott

Can you have a look at this link? It seems to set out a few flags that are not in the spec file. Also, I am not sure from the file what happens with the libevent requirement (I can see a '--with libevent' flag but can't see it in any of the 'buildrequires').

Cheers
dayo
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 158
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 1:33 pm

Re: [atomic] PHP 5.2.13

Unread post by dayo »

scott wrote:They are commented out because the new patch no longer creates those files.
Hi Scott
Looking at diff file from the fpm site, I can see many lines where it looks like the conf file is referenced (as well as some of the other flags in my post above).

If you look around Line 27256 as well, it seems the conf file is supposed to be installed.

Thanks
dayo
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 158
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 1:33 pm

Re: [atomic] PHP 5.2.13

Unread post by dayo »

Discreet Cough
scott
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Posts: 8355
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
Location: earth
Contact:

Re: [atomic] PHP 5.2.13

Unread post by scott »

So what needs to be changed?
Post Reply