spamdyke 4.0.10-6
spamdyke 4.0.10-6
I see there is an updated version of spamdyke with support for mysql. I have already compiled my own version of spamdyke with mysql support with instructions from haggybear.de. Is this based on the same source and should I count on compatibility?
Re: spamdyke 4.0.10-6
based on the infos from http://www.atomicorp.com/channels/atomi ... /repoview/
I would say, Yes it's based on haggybears source.
I would say, Yes it's based on haggybears source.
Re: spamdyke 4.0.10-6
hi
after an upgrade from 4.0 rpm without sql support i get a "killed" when i want to start spamdyke.
@scott: can you add spamdyke to the whitelist (chpax) ?
thanks
zeki
after an upgrade from 4.0 rpm without sql support i get a "killed" when i want to start spamdyke.
@scott: can you add spamdyke to the whitelist (chpax) ?
thanks
zeki
Re: spamdyke 4.0.10-6
Thanks for the info. Will try it out when I get back from my trip out of town...
-
- Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
- Posts: 8355
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
- Location: earth
- Contact:
Re: spamdyke 4.0.10-6
What kernel are you using? Is this 32 or 64 bit?
Re: spamdyke 4.0.10-6
32bit
after a chpax -emsrpx /usr/bin/spamdyke it was okay...
after a chpax -emsrpx /usr/bin/spamdyke it was okay...
-
- Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
- Posts: 8355
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
- Location: earth
- Contact:
Re: spamdyke 4.0.10-6
And by OK you mean exploitable right?
Re: spamdyke 4.0.10-6
that was the fastest solution after the upgrade
Re: spamdyke 4.0.10-6
I installed it manually a few weeks ago and had not to chpax anything to make this version going.
so there must be a better way.
so there must be a better way.
-
- Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
- Posts: 8355
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
- Location: earth
- Contact:
Re: spamdyke 4.0.10-6
exactly, I had the same experience. I suspect its only 32-bit related. If that is indeed the case, I'll just drop the 32-bit packages from the repo.