Using additional signatures

Forum for getting help with Project Gamera, Spamassassin, Clamav, qmail-scanner and other anti-spam tools.
faris
Long Time Forum Regular
Long Time Forum Regular
Posts: 2321
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 11:19 am

Using additional signatures

Unread post by faris »

I realise that the additional signatures that ASL adds to the normal clamav set offers a better level of protection against the kind of nasties that could compromise the security of a server.

But they don't seem to help much with booby-trapped attachments, and we are seeing an alarming number of these being missed.

The scammers are getting more sophisticated in their social engineering, and your typical consumer is undoubtedly going to fall for one eventually. If their own PC's anti-virus is not good, or not up to date, they are going to get clobbered.

So, on our PG boxes, I've set up https://github.com/extremeshok/clamav-unofficial-sigs to automatically download and use some additional signatures.

In all, the script allows you to automatically download Sanesecurity, SecuriteInfo, rfx, FOXHOLE, MalwarePatrol and a few others signature sets. You can then decide on subsets of these signatures, based on their false positive level and suchlike. I was very impressed.

securesite and MalwarePatrol require you to set up fee or premium accounts, and MalwarePatrol prohibits commercial use of any kind.

I've not been running them long enough to make any significant observations other than seeing sanesecurity rules block these nasty attachments very frequently, which I've found encouraging.

Has anyone else had any luck with additional signatures? Does anyone have any recommendations? Any to avoid?
--------------------------------
<advert>
If you want to rent a UK-based VPS that comes with friendly advice and support from a fellow ART fan, please get in touch.
</advert>
User avatar
mikeshinn
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Posts: 4149
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:49 pm
Location: Chantilly, VA

Re: Using additional signatures

Unread post by mikeshinn »

But they don't seem to help much with booby-trapped attachments, and we are seeing an alarming number of these being missed.
Thats on purpose. Those signatures work great for email, but they cause a lot of false positives for web sites that serve up zip files with js, exes, etc. So we purposefully do not include them as clamav has no way of distinguishing if the context is email, or web. So while I agree those signatures are useful for some email users, keep in mind that clamav may be scanning more than just email on your system and this can cause false positives.
faris
Long Time Forum Regular
Long Time Forum Regular
Posts: 2321
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 11:19 am

Re: Using additional signatures

Unread post by faris »

All the more reason, I suppose, to scan mail on a dedicated mailscanner node.
--------------------------------
<advert>
If you want to rent a UK-based VPS that comes with friendly advice and support from a fellow ART fan, please get in touch.
</advert>
Post Reply