Atomic Yum Centos 3.9 retired?

Botham · Unread post by **Botham** » Thu Mar 13, 2008 8:38 pm

We are using CentOS release 3.9 (Final) and our yum updates now spit the dummy. Has this repository been retired??

[root]# yum update
Gathering header information file(s) from server(s)
Server: CentOS-3 - Addons
Server: Atomic Rocket Turtle - 3 - Atomic PSA-Compatible RPMS
retrygrab() failed for:
http://www.atomicorp.com/channels/atomi ... eader.info
Executing failover method
failover: out of servers to try
Error getting file http://www.atomicorp.com/channels/atomi ... eader.info
[Errno 4] IOError: HTTP Error 404: Not Found

Our yum.conf:
[atomic]
name=Atomic Rocket Turtle - $releasever - Atomic PSA-Compatible RPMS
baseurl=http://www.atomicorp.com/channels/atomi ... /$basearch

[plesk]
name=Plesk Server Administrator
baseurl=http://www.atomicorp.com/channels/plesk ... /$basearch
gpgcheck=0

[atomic-app-vault]
name=Atomic Rocket Turtle - 3ES - Atomic PSA App Vault RPMS
baseurl=http://3es.atomicrocketturtle.com/atomic/app-vault/

[base]
name=CentOS-$releasever - Base
baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releas ... $basearch/
gpgcheck=1

Unread post by **scott** » Fri Mar 14, 2008 7:49 am

No it just looks like the yum 1.x header data wasn't generated. We should be able to get that fixed up later today.

Botham · Unread post by **Botham** » Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:24 am

Any luck with this? (I'm still getting the same error)

Thanks in advance

Unread post by **scott** » Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:05 am

Yeah I know whats keeping the old yum data from being generated. Its a deeper fix on our side. If you're using yum 2.0 then this doesn't effect you.

Botham · Unread post by **Botham** » Tue Apr 01, 2008 6:13 am

I yum upgraded yum to yum 2.0.8-2.centos3.noarch but yum updates still fail with:

Gathering header information file(s) from server(s)
Server: CentOS-3 - Addons
Server: Atomic Rocket Turtle - 3 - Atomic PSA-Compatible RPMS
retrygrab() failed for:
http://www.atomicorp.com/channels/atomi ... eader.info
Executing failover method
failover: out of servers to try
Error getting file http://www.atomicorp.com/channels/atomi ... eader.info
[Errno 4] IOError: HTTP Error 404: Not Found

Botham · Unread post by **Botham** » Tue May 06, 2008 9:27 am

Just to note that it works now.

Botham · Unread post by **Botham** » Fri Nov 21, 2008 5:10 pm

The prob with 3.9 appears to have returned?

[root]# yum update
Gathering header information file(s) from server(s)
Server: CentOS-3 - Addons
Server: Atomic Rocket Turtle - 3 - Atomic PSA-Compatible RPMS
Server: Atomic Rocket Turtle - 3ES - Atomic PSA App Vault RPMS
Server: CentOS-3 - Base
Server: CentOS-3 - Extras
Server: Plesk Server Administrator
retrygrab() failed for:
http://www.atomicorp.com/channels/plesk ... eader.info
Executing failover method
failover: out of servers to try
Error getting file http://www.atomicorp.com/channels/plesk ... eader.info
[Errno 4] IOError: HTTP Error 404: Not Found

Kalimari · Unread post by **Kalimari** » Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:41 pm

http://www.atomicorp.com/channels/plesk/README

The archive has moved! Running the installer again will reconfigure your system to use the new channel.

wget -q -O - http://www.atomicorp.com/installers/atomic |sh

That should help.

Botham · Unread post by **Botham** » Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:39 pm

Thanks for your input. That works ok for later Centos platforms but with 3.9 one needs to configure manually and the instructions for manual config don't seem to have been updated if the archive has moved...

[root]# wget -q -O - http://www.atomicorp.com/installers/atomic |sh

Atomic Archive installer, version 0.12.1
Configuring the [atomic] yum archive for this system

CentOS release 3.9 is not supported at this time, you will need to configure yum manually:
see http://atomicorp.com/channels for instructions

Botham · Unread post by **Botham** » Sat Nov 29, 2008 10:25 am

Scott, could you confirm if the centos 3.9 repository has been retired or if it has it just moved?

Unread post by **scott** » Sat Nov 29, 2008 2:26 pm

Botham · Unread post by **Botham** » Sat Nov 29, 2008 4:35 pm

Thanks!

(I have switched it back to CENTOS and seems ok now.)