Why is PHP5.3 in "atomic-testing" and not in "atomic"?

Unread post by **mikeshinn** » Thu Feb 24, 2011 8:31 pm

Is it a +3 against ogres?

Unread post by **scott** » Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:04 pm

...magic....missle.

tlaramee · Unread post by **tlaramee** » Mon Feb 28, 2011 8:49 pm

hi Scott:

thanks for the guidance.

we just moved all of our production stuff to php5.3 (5.3.5-2.el5.art) and it's been
great so far. we run nginx + fastcgi/spawn-fcgi (both via EPEL) + PHP.

Unread post by **scott** » Tue Mar 01, 2011 12:45 am

I think that pretty much says it all right, unless anyone has any objections atomic will be standardizing on the 5.3.x tree.

dayo · Unread post by **dayo** » Thu Mar 03, 2011 11:58 am

tlaramee wrote:we just moved all of our production stuff to php5.3 (5.3.5-2.el5.art) and it's been
great so far. we run nginx + fastcgi/spawn-fcgi (both via EPEL) + PHP.

Scott is a legend.

Shame he doesn't let you use the far more suitable php-fpm yet though.
I am sure he will though ... eventually

Atomicorp

Why is PHP5.3 in "atomic-testing" and not in "atomic"?

Re: Why is PHP5.3 in "atomic-testing" and not in "atomic"?

Re: Why is PHP5.3 in "atomic-testing" and not in "atomic"?

Re: Why is PHP5.3 in "atomic-testing" and not in "atomic"?

Re: Why is PHP5.3 in "atomic-testing" and not in "atomic"?

Re: Why is PHP5.3 in "atomic-testing" and not in "atomic"?