Page 2 of 2

Re: Why is PHP5.3 in "atomic-testing" and not in "atomic"?

Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2011 8:31 pm
by mikeshinn
Is it a +3 against ogres?

Re: Why is PHP5.3 in "atomic-testing" and not in "atomic"?

Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2011 9:04 pm
by scott
...magic....missle.

Re: Why is PHP5.3 in "atomic-testing" and not in "atomic"?

Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 8:49 pm
by tlaramee
hi Scott:

thanks for the guidance.

we just moved all of our production stuff to php5.3 (5.3.5-2.el5.art) and it's been
great so far. we run nginx + fastcgi/spawn-fcgi (both via EPEL) + PHP.

Re: Why is PHP5.3 in "atomic-testing" and not in "atomic"?

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 12:45 am
by scott
I think that pretty much says it all right, unless anyone has any objections atomic will be standardizing on the 5.3.x tree.

Re: Why is PHP5.3 in "atomic-testing" and not in "atomic"?

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 11:58 am
by dayo
tlaramee wrote:we just moved all of our production stuff to php5.3 (5.3.5-2.el5.art) and it's been
great so far. we run nginx + fastcgi/spawn-fcgi (both via EPEL) + PHP.
Scott is a legend.

Shame he doesn't let you use the far more suitable php-fpm yet though.
I am sure he will though ... eventually :P