Atomicorp

Hello all,

I put my scene:

- 1 server with serveral domains, the important one "newlightsystems.com"
- 1 server with serveral domains, the important one "nls.es" , this domain have several redirections to accounts at domain newlightsystems.com as the newlightsystems.com domain is the primary domain.

For example, original account: crk01-at-newlightsystems.com.
crk01-at-nls.es has a redirection to crk01-at-newlightsystems.com , and it's working with all domains like hotmail, etc

- 1 Gamera box between
- ASL system, qmail scanner, spamassassin and all stuff

If I send mails from my account crk01(at)newlightsystems.com to any maildir-at-nls.es there's no problem I can recieve the mail.
The problem is if I send mails from an account "anyaccount(at)nls.es" to my redirections "crk01(at)nls.es or nls(at)nls.es" It's not working.

I have read the logs, and the mail is sent, and also the log from the box "newlightsystems.com" is generating a log, but I get a delivery failure, here is the entire failure:


Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Date: 19 Mar 2009 16:48:49 +0100 [16:48:49 CET]
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=newlightsystems.com; b=RYcXJFrOR0GhAbFwYv1PfQZDgrZZnthtIwLjZpEORk2x/ZGrxXkbe9iCUkl+M1fDs3rT5OstkpPyCqOOdjeOHRTohhvwP4e+7AMJu4jgSf8jezyAFYp13lFhyshFub+J ;
DomainKey-Status: good
From: MAILER-DAEMON@newlightsystems.com
Message-ID: <1237477729102117721@newlightsystems.com>
Received:

* (qmail 10814 invoked by uid 10163); 19 Mar 2009 16:58:27 +0100
* from 213.149.249.8 by nls.es (envelope-from <>, uid 2020) with qmail-scanner-2.02st (clamdscan: 0.94.2/9133. spamassassin: 3.2.5. perlscan: 2.02st. Clear:RC:1(213.149.249.:. Processed in 0.027469 secs); 19 Mar 2009 15:58:27 -0000
* from unknown (HELO gamera1.newlightsystems.com) (213.149.249. by server.nls.es with SMTP; 19 Mar 2009 16:58:27 +0100
* (qmail 12722 invoked by uid 522); 19 Mar 2009 15:48:53 -0000
* from server.newlightsystems.com by gamera1.newlightsystems.com (envelope-from <>, uid 101) with qmail-scanner-2.02st (clamdscan: 0.94/8621. spamassassin: 3.2.5. perlscan: 2.02st. Clear:RC:0(213.149.249.110):SA:0(-0.1/4.0):. Processed in 1.182496 secs); 19 Mar 2009 15:48:53 -0000
* from server.newlightsystems.com (HELO newlightsystems.com) (213.149.249.110) by gamera1.newlightsystems.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2009 15:48:52 -0000
* (qmail 17731 invoked by uid 10382); 19 Mar 2009 16:48:49 +0100
* from by newlightsystems.com (envelope-from <>, uid 2522) with qmail-scanner-2.04st (clamdscan: 0.94.2/9134. spamassassin: 3.2.5. perlscan: 2.04st. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.05604 secs); 19 Mar 2009 15:48:49 -0000

Received-SPF: none (no valid SPF record)
Subject: failure notice
To: kistiss@nls.es
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on nls.es
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=7.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP, RDNS_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.2.5
Cabeceras: Mostrar cabeceras reducidas
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at newlightsystems.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<crk01@newlightsystems.com>:

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path: <kistiss@nls.es>
Received: (qmail 17710 invoked by uid 10382); 19 Mar 2009 16:48:49 +0100
Received: from 213.149.249.8 by newlightsystems.com (envelope-from <kistiss@nls.es>, uid 2020) with qmail-scanner-2.04st
(clamdscan: 0.94.2/9134. spamassassin: 3.2.5. perlscan: 2.04st.
Clear:RC:1(213.149.249.:.
Processed in 0.101274 secs); 19 Mar 2009 15:48:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO gamera1.newlightsystems.com) (213.149.249.
by serveisinsar.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2009 16:48:48 +0100
Received: (qmail 12707 invoked by uid 522); 19 Mar 2009 15:48:50 -0000
Received: from monkey.nls.es by gamera1.newlightsystems.com (envelope-from <kistiss@nls.es>, uid 101) with qmail-scanner-2.02st
(clamdscan: 0.94/8621. spamassassin: 3.2.5. perlscan: 2.02st.
Clear:RC:0(94.23.6.35):SA:0(2.5/4.0):.
Processed in 0.854358 secs); 19 Mar 2009 15:48:50 -0000
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=4.0
X-Spam-Level: ++
Received: from monkey.nls.es (HELO nls.es) (94.23.6.35)
by gamera1.newlightsystems.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2009 15:48:49 -0000
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=default; d=nls.es;
b=l34xQsG2VM9MmidBbHSyBVkCP+kEb10XmbBCS8r2wzypmOA6Ax8Mvm2gSodyiy7bgb0SOORqI76HLFykdqACUjH6/PI7ppNzMGvqFQSH7aSC2cK5DP+y5sUqOXd4vrs5;
h=Received:Received:Delivered-To:DomainKey-Status:X-Spam-Checker-Version:X-Spam-Level:X-Spam-Status:Received:Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:Content-Transfer-Encoding:User-Agent;
Received: (qmail 10794 invoked by uid 10163); 19 Mar 2009 16:58:23 +0100
Received: from by nls.es (envelope-from <kistiss@nls.es>, uid 110) with qmail-scanner-2.02st
(clamdscan: 0.94.2/9133. spamassassin: 3.2.5. perlscan: 2.02st.
Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):.
Processed in 0.018215 secs); 19 Mar 2009 15:58:23 -0000
Delivered-To: 1-crk01@nls.es
DomainKey-Status: no signature
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on nls.es
X-Qmail-Scanner-MOVED-X-Spam-Level:
X-Qmail-Scanner-MOVED-X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=6.0 tests=AWL,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
autolearn=ham version=3.2.5
Received: (qmail 10777 invoked by uid 10163); 19 Mar 2009 16:58:22 +0100
Received: from by nls.es (envelope-from <kistiss@nls.es>, uid 48) with qmail-scanner-2.02st
(clamdscan: 0.94.2/9133. spamassassin: 3.2.5. perlscan: 2.02st.
Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):.
Processed in 0.0132 secs); 19 Mar 2009 15:58:22 -0000
Received: from 35.3.223.87.dynamic.jazztel.es
(35.3.223.87.dynamic.jazztel.es [87.223.3.35]) by webmail.nls.es (Horde
MIME library) with HTTP; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:58:22 +0100
Message-ID: <20090319165822.rwyuz6eisk808g8c@webmail.nls.es>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:58:22 +0100
From: kistiss@nls.es
To: crk01@nls.es
Subject: buenas
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=ISO-8859-1;
DelSp="Yes";
format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.6)

buenas

Problem solved,

the domainkeys in plesk 9.0.1 isn't working, so If I have the verification of incoming mails in server #1 and the signing mails in server #2 ( plesk 9 ) It doesn't work.

To make things go fine, I must desactivate the verification of DK in incoming mails of server #1.

I could desactivate the signing DK mail in server #2 but if any other person sends me a mail with this enabled in plesk9 my server will reject the mail, so I prefer to get more spam but all mails

thanks,