eaccelerator
Re: eaccelerator
yup, thats what i always did and recommended the others. before updates this dir's are empty.
do you know if the patch is included I discussed with scott here http://www.atomicorp.com/forum/viewtopi ... 6&start=15?
do you know if the patch is included I discussed with scott here http://www.atomicorp.com/forum/viewtopi ... 6&start=15?
Re: eaccelerator
the patch I wanted to have to compiled in is somehting that will be in the future release of eaccelerator anyway since it's a bug. interesting is that my system moans about it and yours not.
http://www.eaccelerator.net/changeset/410
http://www.eaccelerator.net/changeset/410
-
- Long Time Forum Regular
- Posts: 2813
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 9:30 am
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: eaccelerator
You can check http://www5.atomicorp.com/channels/sour ... celerator/ for what's exactly in -4.
I have -4 running on over 20 boxes now without any segfaults. However, I have one server here that immediately starts segfaulting when I install php-eaccelerator. (Even without eAccelerator this server is throwing 'zend_mm_heap corrupted' in the error_log from time to time, so this could be an unrelated problem.)
I have -4 running on over 20 boxes now without any segfaults. However, I have one server here that immediately starts segfaulting when I install php-eaccelerator. (Even without eAccelerator this server is throwing 'zend_mm_heap corrupted' in the error_log from time to time, so this could be an unrelated problem.)

Lemonbit Internet Dedicated Server Management
Re: eaccelerator
Unfortunately it seems to me that Scott has not compiled the latest version with the patch.
I there is any reason why? Your conclusion was only the doc-comment-inclusion parameter caused the problems.
Thanks
I there is any reason why? Your conclusion was only the doc-comment-inclusion parameter caused the problems.
Thanks
-
- Long Time Forum Regular
- Posts: 2813
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 9:30 am
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: eaccelerator
You could try building the package yourself and see if applying the patch solves your problem. Or convince Scott to apply it again. I'm not sure we tested that configuration. I believe our tests showed no problems without the patch applied so it was left out, but maybe we failed to trigger the problem that you're seeing.
Lemonbit Internet Dedicated Server Management
Re: eaccelerator
Well I could try it, but I would prefer your way and the let Scott do it since he's an expert and I'm not.
The patch is going to be in eaccelerator 0.9.6.1 but it's only in the changeset now. It solves a problem
with php-cgi/fastcgi and segfaults. This segfault error is independent from the one caused by --with-eaccelerator-doc-comment-inclusion
Scott, would you build -5 just like -4 but with the fix1 you commented out in -4?
Thanks
The patch is going to be in eaccelerator 0.9.6.1 but it's only in the changeset now. It solves a problem
with php-cgi/fastcgi and segfaults. This segfault error is independent from the one caused by --with-eaccelerator-doc-comment-inclusion
Scott, would you build -5 just like -4 but with the fix1 you commented out in -4?
Thanks
Last edited by BruceLee on Mon Mar 15, 2010 4:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Long Time Forum Regular
- Posts: 2813
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 9:30 am
- Location: The Netherlands
Re: eaccelerator
Ah, I don't think we're using PHP via CGI or FastCGI, so that would explain why I haven't had any problems.
Lemonbit Internet Dedicated Server Management
-
- Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
- Posts: 8355
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
- Location: earth
- Contact:
Re: eaccelerator
No thanks! 

Re: eaccelerator
OK, thanks for the info.
I will wait till eaccelerator 0.9.6.1 comes out (where the patch is included) and atomic picks it up.
For now I will stay with 0.9.6-3.art version. -4 is segfaulting.

I will wait till eaccelerator 0.9.6.1 comes out (where the patch is included) and atomic picks it up.
For now I will stay with 0.9.6-3.art version. -4 is segfaulting.
Re: eaccelerator
Hi All,
Held off updating php/eaccelerator due to the issues mentioned here and in this topic: http://www.atomicorp.com/forum/viewtopi ... =12&t=3926. Are the php 5.2.13-1 & php-eaccelerator 1:5.2.13_0.9.6-4 updates stable for NON-Fast/CGI systems? Any one experiencing any problems/segfaults still?
Thanks
Held off updating php/eaccelerator due to the issues mentioned here and in this topic: http://www.atomicorp.com/forum/viewtopi ... =12&t=3926. Are the php 5.2.13-1 & php-eaccelerator 1:5.2.13_0.9.6-4 updates stable for NON-Fast/CGI systems? Any one experiencing any problems/segfaults still?
Thanks
Re: eaccelerator
php-eaccelerator 1:5.2.13_0.9.6-4 is not segfaulting on NON-Fast/CGI systems.
Re: eaccelerator
Many thanks for the update