Which proccesses should be running with Gamera?

travisbell · Unread post by **travisbell** » Sun May 28, 2006 6:06 pm

I installed Gamera as per the intructions here: http://www.atomicrocketturtle.com/Jooml ... iew/77/29/ and it finished without error.

After restarting though, the ONLY mail related process running is clamd. No qmail, smtp, spamd or nothing are running.

Should a mail server of some kind be running? The server as it stand now is not accepting mail...

travisbell · Unread post by **travisbell** » Mon May 29, 2006 6:42 pm

When I attempt to start spamassasin I get the following error:

[root@viper init.d]# service spamassassin start
Starting spamd: [5605] warn: Unknown option: a

I have no idea what that means... anyone know?

Unread post by **scott** » Mon May 29, 2006 9:51 pm

If you can, try using the version from the atomic-bleeding channel, I've made some major changes to package, which among other things, should ensure that spamassassin is configured correctly. It sounds to me like something bad was spliced in there, that might not translate to the more modern syntax.

travisbell · Unread post by **travisbell** » Mon May 29, 2006 9:59 pm

Easiest way to do that to just re-configure yum?

[atomic]
name=Atomic Rocket Turtle - $releasever - Atomic PSA-Compatible RPMS
baseurl=http://3es.atomicrocketturtle.com/atomi ... eleasever/

??

Thanks man! Your contributions for all this stuff is mind blowing.

travisbell · Unread post by **travisbell** » Tue May 30, 2006 1:44 am

FYI - it' sgetting there...

SA starts now, but I am getting this error when I try and start Qmail...

[root@viper log]# svc-start qmail
Starting qmail: (supervise...............) svc-start: Fatal error: supervise for 'qmail/log' did not start! Is svscan running?

Any idea what that means? daemontools not working properly?

breun · Unread post by **breun** » Tue May 30, 2006 7:53 am

I'm not sure what svc-start is supposed to do, but I'd try service qmail start instead.

travisbell · Unread post by **travisbell** » Tue May 30, 2006 10:18 am

svc-start is (I have learned) the supervisor scripts way of starting and stopping services.

FYI service qmail start give me a big:

[root@viper log]# service qmail start
qmail: unrecognized service

breun · Unread post by **breun** » Tue May 30, 2006 10:49 am

Well, I'm not running Gamera (I don't even have svc-start on my systems), but are you sure qmail is installed? What OS are you on?

Unread post by **scott** » Tue May 30, 2006 6:25 pm

Hmm, well Id say something is mangled in there. Do you have any other archives in yum other than mine? BTW, what distro is this?

travisbell · Unread post by **travisbell** » Wed Jun 07, 2006 2:15 pm

NOw that I can reply again....

It's CentOS4 but a VPS (Virtuozzo to be exact...) I read on another post you saying that won't work without some customization?

Unread post by **scott** » Wed Jun 07, 2006 4:58 pm

No it wont work without customization on a vserver. The issue is that PG is built to run from init, which is not something you can normally get to from a vserver box. Assuming you work out how to hack around that, everything else should run normally.

travisbell · Unread post by **travisbell** » Thu Jun 08, 2006 4:44 pm

Is it just me or is there no SpamAssassin package in http://3es.atomicrocketturtle.com/atomi ... /4ES/RPMS/ ?

I have everything working but SA which could be the different versions you spoke of...

I am still getting the following error,

[root@viper var]# service spamassassin start
Starting spamd: [15841] warn: Unknown option: a

On a consider this strange note, until I started smtpd, SA started properly... this is CentOS4 BTW.

Unread post by **scott** » Thu Jun 08, 2006 5:51 pm

You are correct, there is no spamassassin package in atomic-bleeding, you'll want to add the atomic channel for that.

travisbell · Unread post by **travisbell** » Thu Jun 08, 2006 5:52 pm

scott wrote:If you can, try using the version from the atomic-bleeding channel, I've made some major changes to package, which among other things, should ensure that spamassassin is configured correctly. It sounds to me like something bad was spliced in there, that might not translate to the more modern syntax.

Isn't that what you said? I just say cause' I thought you were saying there was a newer version that was not in the [atomic] channel