mysql and apache

General Discussion of atomic repo and development projects.

Ask for help here with anything else not covered by other forums.
Paul
Forum User
Forum User
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 10:44 pm

mysql and apache

Unread post by Paul »

Any chance of the latest versions (5.0.41 for mysql and 2.0.59 or even 2.2.4 for apache) ?
scott
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Posts: 8355
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
Location: earth
Contact:

Unread post by scott »

Yeah I'll do a mysql update soon. Apache is a different story, I doubt that I'll have the bandwidth to take that on. If someone really really wants it, email the sales department :P sales@prometheus-group.com
breun
Long Time Forum Regular
Long Time Forum Regular
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 9:30 am
Location: The Netherlands

Unread post by breun »

If you're on CentOS you can get apache 2.0.59 from the CentOS Plus repository. I like to stay with the official updates, but if you really need functionality only available in newer versions you might want to try this.
Lemonbit Internet Dedicated Server Management
scott
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Posts: 8355
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
Location: earth
Contact:

Unread post by scott »

As if maintaining a kernel, and php werent enough on my plate already :P

A long time ago I had worked on it, and it ended up being one of those cascading dependency trees to get everything integrated cleanly.
Paul
Forum User
Forum User
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 10:44 pm

Unread post by Paul »

breun wrote:If you're on CentOS you can get apache 2.0.59 from the CentOS Plus repository. I like to stay with the official updates, but if you really need functionality only available in newer versions you might want to try this.
I'm on FC4.
Paul
Forum User
Forum User
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 10:44 pm

Unread post by Paul »

scott wrote:Yeah I'll do a mysql update soon. Apache is a different story, I doubt that I'll have the bandwidth to take that on. If someone really really wants it, email the sales department :P sales@prometheus-group.com
I'm not really sure what you mean by that - is apache a big update then (and your bandwidth limited) ?

I'd like apache 2.2.4 really, if you mean you want a donation of some sort then maybe an agreement could be reached, depending on figures.
breun
Long Time Forum Regular
Long Time Forum Regular
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 9:30 am
Location: The Netherlands

Unread post by breun »

FC4 is already EOL'd by the Fedora Project. FC5 will be as well at the end of this month. If you really need apache 2.2 you could migrate to FC6 (which will be EOL in a couple of months as well) or wait until Plesk supports RHEL/CentOS 5.
Lemonbit Internet Dedicated Server Management
Paul
Forum User
Forum User
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 10:44 pm

Unread post by Paul »

Changing the OS is not an option (even if I had the will to keep up with Fedora, who seem to move up a level every few months). I don't need it, I'd just like to be running it.
scott
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Posts: 8355
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
Location: earth
Contact:

Unread post by scott »

I ment the dependencies to create an update for it, its a fairly complex package, and would not just be a single rpm upgrade. On FC4 it would involve a lot of other tertiary package updates, and then all the packages that depend on those. Say for example mod_ssl needs to be updated to work with 2.2.x , that would involve updating openssl, which would involve updating everything that uses openssl (ssh, stunnel, perl modules, etc). So by the time you're done, your more or less running Fedora 7 anyway. :P

I do know folks running the plesk 8.2 beta on centos5 now. So it wont be that much longer til its generally available.
Post Reply