RHFC1 php rpm's

Support/Development for PHP
Mikey_nl
New Forum User
New Forum User
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:43 am

RHFC1 php rpm's

Unread post by Mikey_nl »

Where are the rpm's in the FC1 channel that contains php ?

Regards,
Mike
scott
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Posts: 8355
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
Location: earth
Contact:

Unread post by scott »

The build environment for FC1 is offline for right now, so I haven't been updating that distro. You should be able to use the packages from rh9 though.
Mikey_nl
New Forum User
New Forum User
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:43 am

Unread post by Mikey_nl »

Scott,

did i quick check and i need to fix some dependencies. Wont do it it is working fine and from October 15th we will move the entire platform to new servers. So FC1 is finaly out the produktion range *sigh*

Regards.
brendanr
Forum User
Forum User
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:42 pm

Unread post by brendanr »

Hi,

I'm currently using FC1 (psa 7.5.2) which is running php-4.3.10-3.rhfc1.art on a production server. I really need to upgrade to a later version of php for a few reasons...

So i've changed my yum.conf to use the rh9 art channel. Although when i do a "yum update php" i get the following

Code: Select all

[root@ssl root]# yum update php
Gathering header information file(s) from server(s)
Server: Atomic Rocket Turtle - 9 - Atomic PSA-Compatible RPMS
Server: Fedora Core 1 - i386 - Base
Server: Atomic Rocket Turtle - 1 - SW-Soft PSA 7.5 RPMS
Server: Fedora Core 1 - i386 - Released Updates
Finding updated packages
Downloading needed headers
Resolving dependencies
......identical dependency loop exceeded
package php-mbstring needs php = 4.4.0-3.rh90.art (not provided)
package php needs httpd-mmn = 20020628 (not provided)
package php needs libcom_err.so.3 (not provided)
package php needs libpspell-modules.so.1 (not provided)
package php needs libpspell.so.4 (not provided)
package php needs php-mbstring = 4.4.0-3.rh90.art (not provided)
package php-pgsql needs php = 4.4.0-3.rh90.art (not provided)
package php-mysql needs php = 4.4.0-3.rh90.art (not provided)
package php-mcrypt needs php = 4.4.0-3.rh90.art (not provided)
package php-imap needs libcom_err.so.3 (not provided)
package php-imap needs php = 4.4.0-3.rh90.art (not provided)
Do I need to uninstall existing php and related packages before trying to run "yum install php"?

I'm a bit worried about doing something like this as it is a production server that has some busy sites, so if something does go wrong I obviously cannot afford for things to be down for too long.

Also if this is my best option how would i go about backing up and restoring php and related packages if the sh#$ does hit the fan?

I would really appreciate any help and advice anyone could give.
scott
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Posts: 8355
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
Location: earth
Contact:

Unread post by scott »

I was worried something like that might happen, it looks like the rh9 channel wont be compatible after all. I'm not sure how Im going to handle this, SW-Soft will be ending support for RH9 and FC1 at the end of december, so you'll probably need to upgrade your OS soon anyway. That being said, with my build environment still down, on top of the fact that the FC1 environment has a nasty bug in it, I can't give any kind of ETA on responding to FC1.
brendanr
Forum User
Forum User
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:42 pm

Unread post by brendanr »

Hi Scott,

Thanks for your reply and for the great service you give to the community by offering these channels and forums.

I think I've come to the same realisation myself and will have to setup a new server and move everything to it.

Would you recommend either FC4 or CentOS 4.x as the best choice for the new OS? I think I would be quite keen to get the latest PHP 5 (and 5.1 when it is released) and I know only FC4 offers this currently, but also that Sw-soft has no immediate plans to support FC4 in Plesk.

Maybe I'll have to wait a little while before all these are better supported...
Post Reply