Upgrade from Red Hat Linux 7.3 (!!!)

General Discussion of atomic repo and development projects.

Ask for help here with anything else not covered by other forums.
Fenice
Forum User
Forum User
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 5:36 pm

Upgrade from Red Hat Linux 7.3 (!!!)

Unread post by Fenice »

Hello there -

I found myself with two old RH 7.3 and a RH 8.0 server in my hands, and I wanted to ask you what would you suggest me for a system upgrade.

Is a full re-imaging of the servers the only solution I have, or are there realistic chances of doing a system upgrade to any existing distro? And what tips can you give me in case of a system upgrade?

Thanks!
scott
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Posts: 8355
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
Location: earth
Contact:

Unread post by scott »

Re-imaging is your only option here.
Waylander
Forum User
Forum User
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 10:13 am

Unread post by Waylander »

hi scott,

ive a similar question too,

my old box (1+1) runnin on rh9/plesk 7.5.1
now its time to switch to a new one. is the 1+1 standard fc6 image ok?
they have still no centos image :(

thanks

way
scott
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Posts: 8355
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
Location: earth
Contact:

Unread post by scott »

They dont, but I do :P

wget -q -O - http://www.atomicorp.com/installers/aooi |sh
Waylander
Forum User
Forum User
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 10:13 am

Unread post by Waylander »

scott wrote:They dont, but I do :P

wget -q -O - http://www.atomicorp.com/installers/aooi |sh
hehe, real nice scott :)
ill give it a shot

just one more question...
ive looked into the install file, i understand (or not) that after the install ive a clean, well partitioned min. centos and yum on my box.
ive to backup my psa.key

then?
install the whole psa via atomic?
the key will work with this install? i remember some years ago i had real troubles with my psa-key when i installed a image this NOT commin with psa included.

/edit: WORK psa 8.1 with centos5?

sorry for my bad english :)

way
breun
Long Time Forum Regular
Long Time Forum Regular
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 9:30 am
Location: The Netherlands

Unread post by breun »

CentOS 5 support was added in Plesk 8.2.
Lemonbit Internet Dedicated Server Management
Waylander
Forum User
Forum User
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 10:13 am

Unread post by Waylander »

breun wrote:CentOS 5 support was added in Plesk 8.2.
thx, is there a way to install the whole psa 8.1 via atomic? 1+1 deliver 8.1 and i think the key will not work with 8.2

thanks again

way
breun
Long Time Forum Regular
Long Time Forum Regular
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 9:30 am
Location: The Netherlands

Unread post by breun »

Plesk 8 keys will also work on 8.1 and 8.2.
Lemonbit Internet Dedicated Server Management
Waylander
Forum User
Forum User
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 10:13 am

Unread post by Waylander »

script runnin (sloooow :) )

hmm... the script use the i386 image. any toughts why dont the x86_64?

and what mean

60% [=======================> ] 395,207,368 230K/s eta 30m 1s RAID1 conf printout:
--- wd:2 rd:2
disk 0, wo:0, o:1, dev:sda7
disk 1, wo:0, o:1, dev:sdb7
62% [========================> ] 411,123,472 168K/s eta 27m 47sRAID1 conf printout:
--- wd:2 rd:2
disk 0, wo:0, o:1, dev:sda6
disk 1, wo:0, o:1, dev:sdb6
65% [=========================> ] 426,871,920 206K/s eta 25m 40sRAID1 conf printout:
--- wd:2 rd:2
disk 0, wo:0, o:1, dev:sda5
disk 1, wo:0, o:1, dev:sdb5
69% [==========================> ] 454,358,608 227K/s eta 22m 15s

during the download?

thx

way
Waylander
Forum User
Forum User
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 10:13 am

Unread post by Waylander »

k, the script dont work on the 1&1 Root-Server XL64

100%[=======================================>] 655,984,640 161K/s in 69m 18s

00:55:41 (154 KB/s) - `CentOS-5.0-i386-bin-1of6.iso' saved [655984640/655984640]

Done.
Error: Cannot find the CentOS server image
[root@xxxxxxxxx ~]#
scott
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Posts: 8355
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
Location: earth
Contact:

Unread post by scott »

Disk going bad? Catch me on IM to debug.
Waylander
Forum User
Forum User
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 10:13 am

Unread post by Waylander »

cant send you anything at aim :)

after a short break do the following

reinitialize the box with a 64bit system (fc6 64)
then rerun the script and now downloadin the x86_64 image

had reinit first to a minimum fc6 (think non64). the script fail on suse 10.1 (the original image delivered)

the raid-gliches are gone too

still downloadin... :)

thx

way
Waylander
Forum User
Forum User
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 10:13 am

Unread post by Waylander »

ok, no chance.

think ive to stay with fc6

after downloading the images...

02:52:07 (394 KB/s) - `CentOS-5.0-x86_64-bin-2of7.iso' saved [665100288/665100288]

Done.
Setting up installer kernel: Done
ks path is hd:sda2/ks-1and1x86_64.cfg

and no more... hangs 15 mins now. top say lilo grab one cpu at 100%

any hints?
Waylander
Forum User
Forum User
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 10:13 am

Unread post by Waylander »

the end...

after a reboot, the box is dead...
have to reinit to fc6 again :(

1+1 xl-server owners, save your time :)

thx for the assistance

way

/edit: how long will fc6 supported? any idea?
thx
scott
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Atomicorp Staff - Site Admin
Posts: 8355
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 8:00 pm
Location: earth
Contact:

Unread post by scott »

Ive done 5 installs on fc6 at 1and1 since sunday, I can confirm that it works just fine on both the single and dual cpu boxes. What does the serial console say?

As I mentioned before on the main page (you do read that right? :P) there are some outstanding issues with CentOS 5 on some network hardware at 1and1. Theres nothing I can do about that. Ive run into it at least once so far (out of 100 or so).
Post Reply